Does "For Better or for Worse" mean that you are married for life?
Stuck in a bad marriage for life? "For better or for worse" has been
wrongly applied to attacks that arise from "inside" the marriage
covenant rather than its correct application to attacks that come from
"outside" the marriage covenant relationship. Being "married for
life" means that you are having a great relationship with the person you
are married to because they take the violations of the marriage covenant
seriously and preserve the joy and happiness of marriage union.
"For Better or For Worse," Conditions
of the Covenant
What does it mean when the marriage vows (the conditions of the
marriage covenant) are recited by the marriage partners committing
themselves to stay together "for better or for worse"?
Does "for better or for worse" mean that you are
married for life - regardless of the violations committed against
you in the marriage? The answer is No! Nor has it ever meant that.
There are two separate and distinct areas from where attacks
against the marriage covenant arise:
From within the marriage itself - through the partners
of the covenant.
From outside the marriage relationship - against the
marriage partners.
"For better or for worse" is a commitment by the
marriage partners to rise-up together against those situations
that would threaten the marriage covenant relationship from
outside the marriage.
Many are bound in bad marriages and/or
guilt because of misapplying this part of the marriage vow to
violations that come from within the marriage covenant instead
of it's rightful application to attacks that come from outside
the marriage covenant relationship.
Mistakenly applying this
part of the marriage vow to attacks that come from within the
marriage relationship automatically turns the marriage covenant
into an indissolvable, unbreakable, unconditional covenant (a
covenant without conditions - anything goes). Meaning, you have
to stay married to that person no matter what abuses or
violations they have committed against you in the relationship.
Not even God makes unbreakable unconditional covenants with
sinful man. Yet, we have accepted this mistaken application as
truth thereby believing that a marriage covenant with two sinful
people is supposed to be "unconditional" - without any
conditions.
Within the very meaning of the name
"covenant" lies the essential fact that there are
conditions to a covenant. Violations that occur from within the
marriage itself - by the partners of the covenant, are correctly
applied to the nurturing parts of the vow: "To have and to
hold, to cherish and to love," EVERY covenant has
conditions! The nurturing parts of the marriage vow ARE the
conditions of the covenant to whereby a marriage partner commits
not to intentionally bring harm in anyway to the relationship;
but rather, builds it up. (The full article can be read or
downloaded from: Marriage Covenants Are Conditional (NOT
Unconditional).
Now we can see where all the confusion comes
from. To further illustrate this truth, let's apply the portion
of the marriage vow: "For better or for worse" to
attacks that come from within the marriage covenant. In doing
so, we will re-write the vow to reflect this illustration.
"For Better or For Worse" Mistakenly applied to attacks
from within the marriage covenant:
The man says, "I take this
woman as my wife, to treat her for better or for worse - to abuse
and ill treat her as I wish. To have her meet all my needs; to hurt
her as often as I desire because she is now my wife and cannot
escape; I own her. I can have sex with anyone I desire and do as I
please in complete disregard to her feelings, till death due us
part."
"For Better or For Worse" Correctly applied to attacks
from outside the marriage covenant:
The wife says, "I take this
man as my husband to have and to hold, to cherish and to love, in
sickness and disease, for better or for worse - against any outside
attacks that would threaten our relationship, always seeking ways to
strengthen and grow our relationship till death do us part."
NOBODY would ever consider such a vow where "for better or
for worse" is purposely applied to attacks that come from
within the marriage covenant. However, this is exactly what is
taking place when this portion of the marriage vow is wrongly
applied - it automatically turns the marriage covenant into an
unconditional covenant whereby the marriage becomes indissolvable no
matter what violations have been committed against the other
partner.
Love: The Commitment to Not Violate the Marriage Covenant
Scripture declares that a "marriage covenant" is likened
to the covenant between "Christ and His Bride - the
Church." Which means that when we violate God's covenant (His
commandments) and choose not to change and turn away from our
"wicked ways," our intimate relationship with God is
broken. The first thing God does is deals with us about correcting
the violation of the covenant in order to restore our intimate
relationship with Him. This is exactly what supposed to happen in a
marriage relationship between a husband and wife.
We have been
taught that love is "unconditional" in a marriage
relationship. It is NOT, nor has it ever been. Only
"non-relationship love" is unconditional.
"Relationship love," which is what we find in a marriage,
is ALWAYS conditional.
Let's briefly look at the differences between
"unconditional" (non-relationship love) and
"conditional" (relationship love):
God's
"non-relationship love" is what unconditionally draws us
as "sinners" to a holy God to receive the conditions of
salvation - the new birth. For God SO LOVED THE WORLD that He gave
His only begotten Son, THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVES IN HIM should not
perish but have everlasting life. (John 3:16.)
God's
"relationship love" is what conditionally offers us as
"His children" an intimate relationship with God through
continual obedience to His voice and commandments. He who HAS MY
COMMANDMENTS AND KEEPS THEM, it is he who loves Me. And HE WHO LOVES
ME will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest
Myself to him. (John 14:21.) In "relationship love," God
will "love us" IF we "love Him."
Letting Problems Go Too Long
The common major problem that we see
at DivorceHope in all bad marriages is that the marriage partners
have not taken the corrective decisive actions against covenant
violations for years - many times for 10, 20, 30 and even 40 years!
When you let your marriage go wrong for so long it breaths divorce
or a very unhappy life full of problems. It then makes it much
harder to correct the violations.
When violations come from within
the marriage relationship, one of the worse things a marriage
partner can do is to "hope" that their spouse will change.
"Hoping" that they will change without ever directly
facilitating change and addressing the marriage covenant violations
from the start, normally creates more abuse and violations against a
marriage partner.
Regarding our relationship with God, He always
let's us know the results of our covenant violations - broken union.
A marriage is no different. If a marriage partner does not stop the
violations of the marriage covenant and make necessary corrections,
a permanently broken union will be inevitable.
When a person truly
loves another, they are always on the alert to avoid any violations
that would bring harm to their relationship with the other person.
When a person is steeped in selfishness, they do not truly love at
all. Love is NOT selfish by nature. Instead, all focus of gain is to
self. Violations of the covenant relationship MUST always be
addressed. And when violations are significant or not being
corrected, they must be addressed with an ultimatum to permanently
correct the violations or there will not be any more relationship.